Skip To Main Content

About the Pan-Austro-Nesian Arts Festival

2022/05/05 Views:344

About the Pan-Austro-Nesian Arts Festival

Yulin Lee (KMFA Director and Lead Curator of the 2021 Pan-Austro-Nesian Arts Festival)

Wu Tsan-Cheng, Imaginary Horizon, multi-channel video, 2020-2021.


Why the Pan-Austro-Nesian Arts Festival?

The Pan-Austro-Nesian Arts Festival is the capstone project that we proposed in creating a new cultural brand that represents the city of Kaohsiung. "Pan-Austro-Nesian" is a made-up term that uses the three composing words to convey a position that the exhibition would like to take, a position that is willing to engage in dialogues:


Pan (泛)-expansive, all-inclusive visions that transcend boundaries   
Austro (南方)-plural, non-center-constrained perspectives from the South
Nesian (島嶼)-multi-lateral oceanic connections

 

The concept of “Pan” conveys the intention to break loose from conventional ideologies and mainstream cultural frameworks; the ideas of “Austro” and “Nesian”, associated with fluidity and dissociation, imply a kind of relative “openness”.

      To begin this article and as the lead curator of this exhibition, I feel obligated to share how we first decided to organize this exhibition. During the past five years since I started to serve as Director at Kaohsiung Museum of Fine Arts (KMFA) in 2016, I have been contemplating about how an art museum can lead paradigm shifts. One critical aspect is to build on the massive creative energy of southern artists that the KMFA has accumulated over time and transform it into a narrative element that enriches the modern and contemporary art history discourse not only in Taiwan but even globally. What crystalized from this concept was the South Plus: Constructing Historical Pluralism from the KMFA Collection, the permanent collection gallery that we created following our third-floor renovation in 2019. Over the years, we have attempted to integrate different areas of “the South” and proposed the concept of South Plus, a new coordinate system based on larger scales. This allows us to break free from the museum’s formerly geographical dimension of “southern” and focus more on the political, economic and cultural predicaments long facing the southern city of Kaohsiung. This is how we fit the KMFA within the post-colonial cultural context of the “Global South”.
      While following the KMFA’s former context of the “regional south” or “geographic south”, I also combed through the indigenous collections that my predecessors built, especially with regards to the Contemporary Austronesian Art Project initiated by former Director Lee Jiun-Shyan in 2005.[1] Through deliberately building collections, inviting resident artists and curating related exhibitions, KMFA has not only cultivated Taiwan's contemporary indigenous artists but also, through the forms of art, brought together artists or researchers with Austronesian ties or identities. Over time, the KMFA has accumulated abundant research and discourses on this topic.
      Thus, this inaugural Pan-Austro-Nesian Arts Festival aims to create a more inclusive context and fluid imagination, using concepts such as pluralism, oceanic culture, and boundary-free to break loose from the previous Austronesia and indigenous frameworks under the Contemporary Austronesian Art Project that were rigidly based on languages and blood ties. In this way, we can formally include indigenous cultures as an element in building the KMFA’s South Plus vision. On one hand, we aim to respond to the artistic creativity of Taiwan’s contemporary indigenous artists. We also hope to proactively identify the relevancy between indigenous cultures and contemporary societal development. In constructing the new coordinate system of “South Plus,” introducing dialogue among different cultures to stimulate each other, we want to expand the imaginations and discourses on Taiwan’s cultural sovereignty while also expanding channels for Taiwan to engage in dialogue with the world based on our Austronesia ties.
        On the other hand, as the director of a city art museum, I often think about how we can further enrich the minds of the residents in the city with the keen intuition of artists. In response to Taiwan's rising oceanic awareness and to the “outward-exploring” city image of the southern harbor city of Kaohsiung, this exhibition formulates a visual ground for conscious dialogues. We named this exhibition an “art festival”, which also implies that one day when we garner sufficient energy, we want to be able to regularly hold the Pan-Austro-Nesian Arts Festival.
      I therefore proposed the concept of “Pan-Austro-Nesian”, hoping to take a stride further from our current foundation and to invite artists from around the same ocean to freely express their views and imaginations. We expect the Pan-Austro-Nesian Arts Festival to gradually become a new cultural platform that highlights the various internal and external excursions across ocean currents, and that underlines the rich diversity that cannot be easily categorized.
 

 
      At this moment as we organize the Pan-Austro-Nesian Arts Festival, the world is being devastated by COVID-19. I cannot help but ponder on the alarming message that the pandemic is sending us. Since 2020, we started this “post-pandemic” life, where people are locked down in their homes and global travel has come to a halt. This has undoubtedly cast a serious question mark on the progressive value of modernism. We came to realize that the progressiveness and modernity that we have been so proud of cannot really bring stability. On the contrary, the conflicts between people or human's exploitation of nature have only become more acute.
In discussing the problems caused by modernization, we tend to distinguish between perpetrators and victims, or exploiters or the oppressed. Yet “modernization” itself is a megatrend, a giant whirlpool that sucks everyone in. In fact, for every single person living in the contemporary environment, we are all somehow involved, only to different degrees- in face of Nature losing its capacity, all of us are both the perpetrator and the victim. In this inaugural Pan-Austro-Nesian Arts Festival, we have no intention of proposing theoretical or philosophical solutions to problems associated with modernization. On the contrary, what we are thinking about is that if we do not think of people as the focus of infection, but instead look at ourselves as a form of life, maybe, through artists' creation, we can better handle our historical burden-- rely on art for communication, and even for thinking about the possibility of transformation.
 

 
      The ocean itself has no boundaries. Ocean currents are one of the most spectacular natural phenomena on earth.
      In the Pan-Austro-Nesian Arts Festival, we design the exhibition area as an organic whole. The audience members resemble little boats sailing on the ocean, while the artists' works are like islands emerging in the sea. Each island has its own past and story, yet the islands are also interconnected. The exhibition is divided into three themes: “From Known to Unknown”, “Dark Islands”, and “Circle of Life”.

 

      In the first theme, we look closely at human's attitude towards the ocean. Although we live on land, human's evolution and expansion trajectories are inseparable from sea navigation, which involves journeys that bring people from the "known" to the "unknown". Things that are "known" tend to imply some kind of inertia or conventional understanding. Beneath these conceptions lie the instability that we try to challenge. Therefore, the exhibition intentionally opens with the Seascapes series that the Japanese artist Hiroshi Sugimoto has been taking across the globe for a long period of time. Following these photographs of sea levels undefined by civilization are works by New Zealand Artist John Pule. His work Kehe tau hauaga foou (To all new arrivals) is a blue poetic song that uses abstract star- like symbols to summon the long journeys taken place in the South Pacific waters by islanders sailing to new land or by newly arrived immigrants. Kaohsiung-born Artist Chang Chih-Chung, in his work Sea Unlevel, ponders on the many issues surrounding the ocean under the seemingly stable sea surface. He also uses the swaying physical feeling of a person on the ship deck to point out the cognitive dissonance in contrast with the stable sea level.

      Before entering the next exhibition area titled “Dark Islands”, the viewers encounter Chang En-Man Snail Paradise Trilogy: Departure or Final Chapter, and the work specially commissioned for this exhibition, Jakarta Event Book by Chiu Chieh-Sen and Margot Guillemot. These two works both deal with the moments when the so-called “modernization” was about to form or was gradually formed, only that they take very different perspectives. The difference is that the Jakarta Event Book focuses on how the Europeans entered foreign lands during the Age of Discovery in the 16th century. The artist combined satellite images to visually overlap the contemporary and historical “views” and “imagination”. Chang En-Man Snail Paradise Trilogy: Departure or Final Chapter continues the Snail Paradise series, focusing on the spread of the Giant African Snails with the expansion of the empire. Chang embarks on an exploration of identity, tracing the expedition routes that resemble slime trails left behind by snails to investigate the intertwined history between the islands and colonization.
     The second exhibition theme, “Dark Islands”, further explores the impacts of imperialism and colonialism, and enters the deep waters of community conflicts and exploitation. Born in Korea and raised in Denmark, Jane Jin Kaisen's work Community of Parting gives viewers a glimpse of the northern Pacific Ocean. Rooted in her long-term research, the artist gently touches upon the shamanic rituals and the scars of war. As for Artist Wang Hong-Kai, she studied Uong e Yatauyungana, a composer of the indigenous Tsou tribe, through field studies and archival research to revisit and represent the sounds and voices of the Japanese colonization period and White Terror era. Australian artist Jonathan Jones uses tree rubbing to trace how colonialism and modern industrialization had disregarded land justice and overlooked the deep ties that were supposed to exist between indigenous people and their land.
     In industrialized cities and based on the principles of modern art, indigenous craftsmanship is often treated as a kind of anthropological specimen or some kind of existence that needs to be transformed; its intrinsic artistic value seems to be questioned. We are concerned about this value gap and hope to break free this narrow definition so that we can bring to light the rich variety and abundance of all kinds of visual expressions. When we see Wu Sih-Chin's Muntjac Imitation and Labay Eyong's My Traditional Costumes Are Not Traditional-2021, we may then be able to further perceive this kind of duality and transformative nature. Museum collections, hunting restrictions under government regulations…..Labay Eyong deliberately presented her transformed woven fabrics as unearthed objects to emphasize the physical sense of weaving and the ironic perspective of the audience looking down on these “cultural relics”. Wu Sih-Chin's work resonates with the memories of the Lukai tribe hunters and explores whether people dream of returning to the mountains and forests of muntjacs. We see the clash between modern and tradition, and even witness the inequality of power.
      Then we enter the third exhibition area themed “Circle of Life”. Australian artist Lola Greeno created these traditional necklaces with seashells. In the artist's island culture, seashells have extremely high aesthetic quality and value. Different from the simplistic and mechanized modern industrial production, the artist demonstrates this intricate and profound process of cultural production. As a comparison, Masiswagger Zingrur's creation of Paiwan ceramic pots, while retaining their shape and function, emphasizes the passing of time in hand-sculpturing. Production activities, daily life and people thus form an intimate and harmonious relationship. Yuki Kihara's A Song About Sāmoa is an ode to the ocean, her identity, and life. She applies Samoan weaves to furisode kimono and combines the ocean images with traditional Japanese patterns. Family affection and blood ties, life and memories, as well as hand-woven techniques and aesthetic tastes of different cultures are all integrated into this work. New Zealand artist Ngahina Hohaia's work Paopao ki Tua o Rangi also combines her cultural heritage with her contemporary interpretation of her own life. The drumstick (poi) that she made with her father creates colorful illusions with shadow and light, responding to the artist's video images of revisiting memory. Kulele Ruladen's work “Emadi 4” uses the contrast of strong, abstract colors to reflect upon the color aesthetics of Paiwanese glass beads, and also respond to the creation myths passed down by ancestors in the tribe.

 

 Masiswagger Zingrur and his works. Photo by Lin Hong Long.

 

      In the end, we hope to bring the audience back to the ocean again. Idas Losin's Island Hopping Project attempted a new exhibition arrangement in the Pan-Austro-Nesian Arts Festival. This Island Hopping Project coincides with the “cultural encounter” concept that I have been talking about. It is not just a kind of journey where people merely check-in at places, but a solid, immersive experience where one is deeply rooted on the ground and feels the affinity in languages, blood ties or cultures, just like the embroidered blood vessels in Idas Losin’s The Heart- Pacific Island Series: Pongso no Tao in the Island Hopping Project. Wu Tsan-Cheng's Imaginary Horizon is an extension of the artist's ten-year Taiwan Sound Map project. It uses sound archeology to record the moving traces and fleeting sounds from the KMFA to the Orchid Island. Rahic Talif's Standing Dance shows the bouncing waves and the posture of the artist picking up driftwood. It also shows the dance between human and nature, human and their ancestors, and dances among different people.”Circle of Life” aims not only to evoke a more abundant and gentler interactive relationship between nature and man, but also suggests the core value of the “Pan-Austro-Nesian” . That is, after the conflicts from cultural encounters (i.e. Dark Islands), we hope to provide a new platform that accommodates and supports dialogues of pluralistic cultures and their values. In this way, a light may be shed into the deadlock of mainstream modernist value system that most of us are still living in.

 

 

Wu Tsan-Cheng, Imaginary Horizon, multi-channel video, 2020-2021.

 

 

      In addition to the indoor display, the exhibition also covers the most featured outdoor compound of the KMFA. We proposed a new concept of “Land Art” by initiating the Ecological Restoration Project of Aquatic Plants in order to redesign the museum compound. Our park has been quite ecologically friendly, but it lacked a good program that facilitates educational and artistic experiences for our visitors. So in this exhibition, we invited the Lecturer Lu Chieh-Ming, who is teaching at Chung Yuan Christian University and his students from the indigenous program to design a sustainable and organic landscape composed of aquatic plants that carry cultural significance. By bringing these plants from indigenous tribes to the museum compound, we created an explicit and dialogistic artistic landscape that continues to develop in progress. To create a carrier near the water area, we also introduced a piece of bamboo weaving work titled Tuturu ki Pusul by Sirayan artist Varig Tinaway. Translated into the meaning of a “triangle”, the work is a recombination of the words found in the Gospel of Matthew in the Sirayan language over 400 years ago. In the circle of life, we must think about living in the past, applying to the modern, and recreating in the future.
      With the Pan-Austro-Nesian Arts Festival, I hope to open up new dialogues. In recent years, the KMFA has accumulated great energy by working with internationally leading museums and by organizing special exhibitions since our administrative reform in 2017.This Festival is the first time that we integrated research and curatorial resources, and built a museum-wide curatorial team with our entire research manpower. Aside from our in-house curatorial team, we are especially honored to invite two influential curators of Pacific contemporary art as our curatorial consultants—Reuben Friend, Director of Pātaka Art + Museum, and Zara Stanhope, Director of Govett-Brewster Art Gallery/Len Lye Centre (GBAG/LLC) and former curator of the QAGOMA Asia Pacific Triennial of Contemporary Art.  Together we invited representative artists from New Zealand Australia, Pakistan, Korea, Japan, and France to engage in dialogues with Taiwanese artists. These two international curators have given a lot of valuable suggestions regarding the list of participating artists and for the curatorial context of this exhibition.

 

 

      In addition to thanking the curatorial team for their hard work, I would also like to express gratitude to the Ministry of Culture, the Ocean Affairs Council, and Bureau of Cultural Affairs, Kaohsiung City Government for their considerable support. The National Museum of Human Rights was of tremendous help in providing access to Uong e Yatauyungana 's archives for artist Wang Hong-Kai We also thank the Australian Office Taipei and the Museum Friends Association for sponsoring this exhibition. Although the pandemic has brought much tension and pressure to our curatorial work, we are particularly grateful to the Queensland Art Gallery & Gallery of Modern Art, Pātaka Art+Museum, Auckland Art Gallery, Milford Galleries and Xue Xue Foundation for agreeing to lend us their important collections so that we can share them with the audience in Taiwan. For almost three years, our curatorial team went through countless rounds of debates, mutual critiques and dialectical discussions, and by garnering domestic and international support, we finally present the Pan-Austro-Nesian Arts Festival. This is undoubtedly a revolutionary breakthrough in terms of the methodologies in art administration and curation of an international exhibition of this scale in Taiwan.

 

 



[1] When the KMFA first opened in 1994, Director Huang Tsai-Lang identified sculptures as one of the two main collection areas, and thus procured quite a number of works from indigenous sculptors. Director Hsiao Tsung-Huang in 2001 also attached great importance to contemporary indigenous artworks and planned to commission a research study on contemporary indigenous art in 2004, though it did not fall through. When Director Lee Jiun-Shyan came on board, he spearheaded the promotion of Austronesia contemporary art and implemented the Contemporary Austronesian Art Project between 2007 and 2009.

 

Related Articles